Help us keep the list up to date and submit new video software here.
Tool
All reviews for Libav
| 6 reviews, Showing 1 to 6 reviews |
It seems that branch 12 will bot released before I am 6 feet under!
That sucks! LIBAV is not a good choice for developers who wants to be up-to-date!
Your overall better choice is FFMPEG!
That sucks! LIBAV is not a good choice for developers who wants to be up-to-date!
Your overall better choice is FFMPEG!
Review by Jim_pansen on
Aug 4, 2016 Version: 11,7
OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ease of use: 3/10
Functionality: 10/10
Value for money: 10/10
Overall: 5/10
Still no branch 12 to see on the horizon!
That makes me tired...
That makes me tired...
Review by Jim_pansen on
Mar 1, 2016 Version: 12
OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ease of use: 1/10
Functionality: 10/10
Value for money: 10/10
Overall: 10/10
It still does not have proper support for Avisynth 2.6, is a shame.
Review by remanyao on
Feb 29, 2016 Version: Libav
OS: Windows 7 Ease of use: 5/10
Functionality: 5/10
Value for money: 5/10
Overall: 5/10
Simply annoying is the long time between major release versions. Version 12 is under development since more than a half year, but we still see no release version announced. I just complain about it because most open source software developer do not use nightly builds so new features not come to life in proper libav based softwsae tools while ffmpeg based tools have it included due to their faster integration to release versions & the shorter release cycles.
I do not say that ffmpeg is more better than libav or the other way around. I just say that great developments does not cone to life without a force to release it soon. Development in libav is great, but please let it out all the good work you did to can use all the good work in great tools such as VLC Player or Handbrake. If these tools would use ffmpeg libraries the missing features & format support would be already a part of it...
My hope for the future is to see libav & ffmpeg teams joined.
I do not say that ffmpeg is more better than libav or the other way around. I just say that great developments does not cone to life without a force to release it soon. Development in libav is great, but please let it out all the good work you did to can use all the good work in great tools such as VLC Player or Handbrake. If these tools would use ffmpeg libraries the missing features & format support would be already a part of it...
My hope for the future is to see libav & ffmpeg teams joined.
Review by Jim_pansen on
Nov 1, 2015 Version: 12
OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ease of use: 5/10
Functionality: 10/10
Value for money: 10/10
Overall: 5/10
Twelve years ago that Avisynth use, in ffmpeg I have no problems, in mencoder I have no problems, in libav:
"avconv version v12_dev0-1322-g4e17946, Copyright (c) 2000-2015 the Libav developers
built on May 24 2015 18:24:04 with gcc 4.8.3 (Gentoo 4.8.3 p1.1, pie-0.5.9)
C:\Program Files (x86)\LIBAV\usr\bin\LIBRA.avs: Invalid data found when processing input"
Please fix it.
Thank you.
"avconv version v12_dev0-1322-g4e17946, Copyright (c) 2000-2015 the Libav developers
built on May 24 2015 18:24:04 with gcc 4.8.3 (Gentoo 4.8.3 p1.1, pie-0.5.9)
C:\Program Files (x86)\LIBAV\usr\bin\LIBRA.avs: Invalid data found when processing input"
Please fix it.
Thank you.
Review by remanyao on
Jun 2, 2015 Version: Libav 11.4
OS: Windows 7 64-bit Ease of use: 10/10
Functionality: 5/10
Value for money: 10/10
Overall: 5/10
Seems to work as it should. Although, I still don't see the point why I should use this rather than ffmpeg. Developer's page says:
"It originates from the FFmpeg codebase, but goes its own way these days, providing its users with reliable releases and a clear vision how to go forward."
Doesn't say much to me. Is there any remarkable difference?
"It originates from the FFmpeg codebase, but goes its own way these days, providing its users with reliable releases and a clear vision how to go forward."
Doesn't say much to me. Is there any remarkable difference?
Review by pintcat on
Mar 24, 2013 Version: 9.4
OS: Linux Ease of use: 8/10
Functionality: 9/10
Value for money: 1/10
Overall: 8/10
| 6 reviews, Showing 1 to 6 reviews |